Of all furniture forms, the chair may be the paramount one. While most other objects (except the bed) are created to support objects, the chair supports the human form. The term chair is intended to be looked upon here in the most open sense, from stool to throne to derivative makes including the bench and sofa, which might be considered as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not evidently labeled.
The social history of the chair is as curious as its history as a creative craft. The chair is not merely a physical support and/or aesthetic artwork; it historically was symbolic of social place. Within the historical royal courts there were plain signifiers between possessing a chair with arms, or a chair with a back but without arms, or worse having to sit on a stool. From the 20th century, a director’s and manager’s chair has become an identifier of superior status, and in democratic governments the speaker sits on a raised platform.
As a furniture creation, the chair can be employed for a wealth of various models. There are chairs designed to attend to man’s age and physical capabilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to show his position in society (the executive chair, the throne). During past times there were chairs for births (birth chairs); during the 20th century, there have been chairs for ending life (the electric chair). There are chairs with one, two, three, and/or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. There are chairs that can be folded up, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our contemporary lifestyle has developed particular chairs in automobiles and aircraft. Every one of these chair shapes has changed to suit to growing human desires. Due to its particular connection with man, the chair comes to its full advantage only when being utilised. Though it does not make any difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a chest of drawers whether there are things inside or not, a chair is seen best and evaluated by a person using it, for chair and sitter suit each other. Thus the different parts of a chair have been given labels according to the areas of the human form: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the basic role of a chair is to support your body, its worth is valued generally from how fully it measures up to this practical use. In the manufacture of the chair, the chair maker is bound within particular static regulations and principal measurements. Within these boundaries, however, the chair designer has awesome freedom.
The history of the chair covers a period of several thousand years. There are civilizations that held iconic chair forms, as expressions of the premier craft in the spheres of craft and design. Within these peoples, individual note must be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the reigns of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the construct of masterful design, are known from tomb findings. The first one of the two is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The typical Egyptian chair had four legs designed similar to those of a chosen animal, a curved seat, and a sloping back supported over vertical stretchers. In this way a solid triangular design was made. There was in our view no notable difference in the construction of Egyptian thrones and chairs for regular populace. The general change was in the decorative ornamentation, in the choice of more valuable inlays. The Egyptian folding stool most probably was manufactured as an easily packed seat for army soldiers. As a camp stool that type existed until much later points in time. But the stool then also was designed as the use of a ceremonial seat, its original job as a folding stool fast forgotten. This can now be noted, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, created in ebony with ivory inlay decoration and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are made in the construction of folding stools but cannot be folded as the seats are made from wood. The simplistic construction of the folding stool, made of two frames that turn on metal bolts and have a seat of leather or fabric set between them, can be seen but somewhat later during the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The best known of this kind is the folding stool, made of ashwood, now found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The typical Greek chair, the klismos, is found not from any ancient fossil still existing but in a large amount of pictorial items. The significant kind is the klismos depicted on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial ground outside Athens (c. 410 BC). The klismos is a chair that had a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of these legs are displayed. These creative legs were considered to have been crafted out of bent wood and were likely to have been subjected to huge pressure with the weight of the sitter. The joints holding the legs to the frame of the seat would have had to be therefore super solid and were particularly indicated.
The Romans borrowed from the Greek design; evidence of casts of seated Romans display chairs of a thicker and in appearance kind of less delicately designed klismos. Both kinds, light and heavy, were seen again as part of the Classicist period. The klismos design can be seen in French Empire furniture, in English Regency, and in some particular brands of marked iconicism within Denmark and Sweden circa 1800.
China
The ancestry of the chair in China cannot be followed as long as chairs in Egypt and Greece. From the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an undamaged folio of drawings and artworks has been kept safe, detailing the insides and outside of Chinese buildings and the designs of furniture. Another preservation of the 16th century are some chairs made from wood or lacquered wood, that bear an intriguing similarity to pictures of past chairs.
Same as in Egypt, there existed two standard chair designs in China: a chair of four legs and a folding stool. The four-legged chair can be found both with or without arms but always with the square seat and straight stiles (vertical side supports) to support the back. In one design, though, the stiles were delicately curved over the arms to conform correctly to the form of the S-shaped back splat (the main upright of the back). Each of the three sections are mortised on the yoke-like top rail. While the style of the Chinese back splat had an inspiration for English chairs in the Queen Anne period, wooden members that just to a restricted extent stabilise corner joints (and furthermore were loose in the bargain) signify a signature signatory to Chinese chairs. The four legs sit through the seat frame, which finishes about the rounded staves. All members are round in section or possesses rounded edges—an acknowledgement perchance to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not comfortable and occasionally had a plaited bottom. These chairs demanded of the sitter to hold themselves stiff and upright; when too much weight is placed on the back, the chair has a tendency to topple over. In patriarchal Chinese houses of this period armchairs presumably were kept for the senior people, for they were esteemed greatly.
The Chinese folding stool is thought to have taken to China from the West. It does not vary so very much from the Egyptian or Scandinavian folding stools, but it has a dissimilarity in that the top rail is intricately fixed to the two legs of the stool by means of a curved member, which is usually designed with metal mounts. From a Western point of view the overall effect of both furniture forms is stylized. The construction and decoration aspects are combined in a style that is simultaneously naïve and refined. The patchwork appearance is an upshot of the way that the individual items do not seem to have been put together by means of either glue or screws, but were mortised on one another and held in position in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain during the 17th century also had its name on the chair. Artworks display a style of chair with a relatively unrefined wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, possessing two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in between, stitched to show up a pattern of tiny pads. The front board and a corresponding board at the back could be folded after loosening some small iron hooks. Therefore the chair was a readily portable piece of furniture while traveling which, at the same era, had the dignity of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered kind of chair can be evidenced in engravings of the interiors of affluent Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and also in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Though this design of chair might also be found in countries in which Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won acclaim, it is not determined that the design actually was instigated in The Netherlands. Usually, the legs of the chair were smooth, round in section, and of thin dimensions; they are occasionally baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is patently a bourgeois piece of furniture and was manufactured in impressive amounts, as evidenced from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which a whole row of this kind of chairs lined up against a wall. The design asserts itself by virtue of its elegant proportions and fine upholstery in gilt leather or fabric bordered with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature of forms—that is to say, as developed in Paris around 1750—spread over most of Europe and was imitated or copied during the mid-20th century. The style owes its popularity to a combination of comfort and charm. The seat adheres to the human body and permits a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Usually the seat and back are upholstered, and there are small upholstered pads on the armrests. Smooth transitions achieved between seat frame, legs, and back disguise all the joints, which are solidly constructed on craftsmanlike methods in spite of the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations thereof are made from wood of relatively thick measurements; but all members are deeply molded, all extraneous wood has been taken away, and more expensive designs can be further embellished with very delicate and decorative woodwork. The wood could be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is usually used for the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; cane is sometimes used as an alternative to upholstery.
English chairs of the 18th century were more variable in form than the French. The French touch for stylistic uniformity, which lead from the premier circles in Paris and Versailles over most of France and was popular in several parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became popular and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
Within the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper brands of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, purport that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on reception desks in Brisbane contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.
Sphere: Related Content